Evidence on the pros and cons of various surgical and non-surgical treatments for rotator cuff tears is limited and inconclusive, a new review of published studies concludes.
This literature review is part of a growing type of research called comparative research. Comparitive research will help determine which treatments and interventions are superior. This includes comparing surgical versus non-surgical and and comparing different treatments within the surgical realm and the non-surgical realm. This will help greatly to improve patient care by allowing doctors and other practitioners to practice in a more evidence based manner, decrease cost, and decrease side effects and adverse events.
Best fix for rotator cuff tear remains uncertain.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment